As you probably know, the International Council of Museums recently proposed a new definition for museums. Although the vote on the definition was postponed, the conversations that it sparked have been valuable and provocative. On the next episode of Museopunks, we wanted to try to unpack more nuance and perspectives than we can do with any single interview, so we’re crowdsourcing some responses to the following prompts or questions.
- Do we need a new international definition of museums?
- How might a new definition affect the sector and/or your work within it?
- Is this discussion important within your national setting?
- Has the conversation changed anything for you, or is this discussion a distraction?
- Was this the right definition?
- What is a museum? What is your vision for museums?
- What else should we be thinking about in this conversation?
If you want to contribute, please send me a short (1min-5min) audio recording of your perspectives. In your recording, please identify yourself as you’d like to be represented on the show, as well as noting your country and if you’re an ICOM member.
We’re doing this as a bit of a sprint, so it would be amazing if you could send me your reply by Sunday this week (October 6).
We’ll be selecting a number of responses to go on the episode, but may also release an additional track online featuring other responses if we receive too many to feature on the show. We’d love to hear from people in different parts of the world too, so if you’re somewhere that we don’t always feature via our guests, get in touch!